Judge Robin Clute Protects Criminals, Violates Victims, Denies Due Process and Promotes Montana Hate Crimes.. Flat OUT...

All of this Signed to, Swore to By Sean Boushie.  He went over all this in HIS hearing, I had a clear Truthful Defense for each Lie, Exaggeration and Falsehood.  Judge Robin Clute let Sean Boushie talk for 45 minutes, and she said that I would have a chance to defend, to submit evidence but clearly her  decision was previously decided for she gave me NO DEFENSE.

Even accused me of sending the Death Threat to myself, attacked me on the web stats of MINE that he used to say I was stalking him... Judge Robin Clute staged this and had it all planned before this day, she had given his ordre perviously based on all in his HUGE protective order request (which in my opinion was not written by him but he had corrupt law enforcement help him - it was to ridiculous and elaborate).  Anyway, she had not even read the information and admitted it in court and read the information in front of me. 

I am Not Sure Why they Keep Turning Side Ways But Here they are Anyway,
You Can Click to EnLarge.

It is ALL lies that I was Never Allowed to Present the Truth With.
Judge Robin Clute Stripped me of My Rights and gave a Protective Order based on Lies, False Accusations, False Affiliations, and Flat Out Fraud on the Courts....

Above I have posted this Protective Order ALLOWD by Judge Robin Clute and served to me by Officer Maury McKinney after He knew FULL well that Sean Boushie had access to the Email that Send me a Death Threat, Officer McKinney will be Sued, and I will attempt to press Criminal Charges for endangering my life though NO ONE IS LISTENING, instead it is ALL hands on deck to protect the Criminal and to Further Victimize the Real Victim.

This paperwork Served to me goes on and on about people I have nothing to do with, and the Stephen Mocko email that I had NOTHING to do with yet Incriminates SEAN and the LAW well No RED FLAGS there.. NO Real Investigative WORK EVER DONE...

After the Corrupt Cruel Hearing, my Protective Order simply Said Stay away from him, which I had NEVER a reason to go near him, but he can Legally Walk right Up to Me... and this order Said I cannot post Electronically about Sean Boushie or his wife... thing is I had NEVER said anything about his wife EVER... and after this Sean Posted Constantly about me, send me emails, Searched my Sites with Harassing Threatening Keywords Searches and OTHER internet Stuff the courts PRETEND to simply NOT understand.. After this he has hate groups, hate sits and encourages other sto hate me .. ALL Day at his FULL TIME job paid to Hate a Montana Lesbian By the University of Montana who was made away in later Summer of 2009 of this Hate Crime and they "Investigated" and found nothing.. what a Pack of Lies that is.. a University Tech Dept.  ... surely they get this Internet "thing"....

He admits in this to Getting the Stephen Mocko EMAIL... it was SENT to CrystalCoxIsABitch@Yahoo.com  (which any judge or honest county attorney, sheriff or cop could get the identity of in minutes unless they have reason to hide the TRUTH)  anyway.. THIS proves without a doubt he Sent the Horrible, Vile, Lewd, Degrading, Defaming Death Threat and posted those same remarks on his hate blog last summer and a Real Estate Review site... (again a NON Corrupt Judge, County Attorney or Law Officer could get these records from google or yahoo in a very short order... they never even tried)

In the Above Sean Boushie WANTS the Court to Make me REMOVE all "sandptcl" and "University of Montana Stalker" from my blogs and sites.  Does this NOT tell the Courts that this is Him, why would he DEMAND I remove those words if they were unrelated to him.  And by the way.. I proved for months and months at that time my "University of Montana Stalker" searched the name Sean Boushie ALL day everyday.. who would do that..   Judge Clute would not listen to ANY of my REAL PROOF, I broke down, I cried REAL tears, showed and felt real fear and SHE protected this Evil Man to continue threatened to Kill Me, Ruin me, burn me and getting others to join... Judge Robin Clute WILL be sued for endangering my life, participating in a Hate Crime, Stripping me of my Civil Rights, my Human Righs and Allowing this MONSTER to continue his rage for going past 7 months SOLID now...  no remorse.. no letting up and posting on blogs that others get a Protective Order against me so they can do the same thing..

Who or what is "sandptcl" that Sean Boushie is in such a Rage about? 

If "sandptcl" has NOTHING to do with Sean Boushie then why care that it is on my site... and why obsessively search it on PAID time at the U of M in Missoula Montana.. I have all these Stats, the U of M has seen them .. Montana Judges and Cops have seen them and Still he continues to RAGE, to Hate, to Threaten to Harass... paid for by the University of Montana and Supported and Encourged by Montana Corruption.

Well "sandptcl" is the Author of a hate blog about me last summer, this hate blog talked about the same stuff, verbatum as my Death Threat and included disturbing defamation on my Real Estate Company and Paul Stramer.    It was important to Prove this identity for my Defamation Lawsuit against Sean and to Prove who sent my death threat with actual internet IP and other technical Proof...

So I saved copies of the blog, which he dropped right after Judge Stormy Langston asked him if it was his.. Anyway, I do get this Internet Thing so I googled ... "sandptcl" in quotes of course, and I came up with these Hook Up Sites where people talk about sex, and talk about meeting for sex.  I contacted the company and they said no problem we take this stuff serious, have your attorney fax us the docket number of the case and we will get the identity of that person to them right away..

my Attorney NEVER did.. though paid a Thousand Dollar Retainer to do so... she was somehow stopped and NEVER did do anything to help me .. only took more and more of my money when I asked if she was going to.. it would have taken 5 minutes to Supeona the Sex Site, Google, Yahoo.. and the Case would have been over.. oh but wait if we do that then we will have to admit that Paul Stramers Protective order was unjust and Illegal so let's just ignore the Screams for Help from this Woman and Let Sean Boushie KEEP attacking her so we don't have to admit what we did to set up Paul Stramer, which had NOTHING TO DO WITH ME...

They total violating my Civil Rights and they continue to ... right now still today.. a Really Smart Civil Rights Attorney COULD make MILLIONS on this Case, Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com   I have proof on the State of Montana, the U of M, Missoula Police Dept., Town of Eureka, Eureka Police, Lincoln County, Ravalli County and many - many more.. they have Defamed me, tried to trash my business, but my life at risk and allowed others to now be brought in by Sean and has Defamed and Threatened them and STILL they do nothing....

This Order associates me with a Political Agenda out of Hamilton that I was NO part of, which further made Robin Clute HATE me and it was not even TRUE at That Time.. I am sure interested in what the Folks in Hamilton are saying now and especially after watching www.BeneathTheBeauty.com   TURNS out Judge Clute does not even have a LEGAL right to issue a Protective Order as Hamilton is Not incorporate YET their Reign of Terror on the Citizens is TRULY unstoppable....

So are there any Standards of Practice, or Montana Laws that Apply to Who Can Get a Protective Order?

It seems to me that Montana Courts use Protective Orders to STOP the flow of information and the Transparency of Government and Law Enforcement Actions.  For I did nothing Illegal and Judge Stormy Langston of Lincoln County Denied My Rights based on my Fear alone, and Judge Robin Clute gave Sean Boushie a Protective order with tons of proof of the Crimes he had Committed and Seemingly based not only on that Fraud but on his Fear.  

Meanwhile 2 weeks before Judge Hayne - District Court Judge in Hamilton listed reasons of not being related, not a boyfriend and other reasons why he would NOT give me a Protective Order.  So are there any RULES to what warrants a Protective Order?  Are there in Laws in Montana what so ever that govern this, is anyone watching over Court Corruption at ALL.  I did NOTHING wrong, I proved that, Judge Robin Clute Violated my Rights.
Is Judge Robin Clute Above the Law, or was she in the Right and Judge Hayne Violated the Law... something is Very Wrong in Lincoln and Ravalli County Montana.  And the Rights of the Tax Paying Citizens has been Completely Stripped in every way.

If the Good Citizens speak out they are subject to Economic Terror - they are run out business or denied contracts.  And many get death threats or worse.

Below is Judge Haynes Denial and Why, and THEN Judge ROBIN Clute Gave My Attacker a Protective Order Against Me.

Montana Code Annotated REASONS that Judge Hayne Gave / Cited as his Reason for Denying me a Protective Order.  Also Below is that Original Signed Page from 8/21/09 and of course it is filmed in the Documentary  www.BeneathTheBeauty.com 

MCA 40-15-301

""40-15-301. Jurisdiction and venue. (1) District courts, justices' courts, municipal courts, and city courts have concurrent jurisdiction to hear and issue orders under 40-15-201.  


(2) When a dissolution of marriage or parenting action involving the parties is pending in district court, a person may file a petition for an order of protection in a justice's, municipal, or city court only if the district court judge assigned to that case is unavailable or if the petitioner, to escape further abuse, left the county where the abuse occurred.

The petitioner shall provide a copy of relevant district court documents to the justice's, municipal, or city court, along with the petition. The justice of the peace, municipal court judge, or city court judge shall immediately certify the pleadings to the original district court after signing an order of protection under this subsection. The district court shall conduct the hearing unless both parties and both courts agree that the hearing may be conducted in the court of limited jurisdiction.

If the district court is unable to conduct a hearing within 20 days of receipt of the certified pleadings, it shall conduct a hearing within 45 days of the receipt of the pleadings, unless the hearing is continued at the request of either party for good cause or by the court. If the hearing is continued, the order of protection must remain in effect until the court conducts the hearing.

(3) If one of the parties to an order of protection files for dissolution of marriage or files a parenting action after the order of protection is filed but before the hearing is conducted, the hearing must be conducted in the court in which the order of protection was filed. Either party may appeal or remove the matter to the district court prior to or after the hearing.

If the district court is unable to conduct a hearing within 20 days of receipt of the certified pleadings, the district court shall conduct a hearing within 45 days of receipt of the pleadings. The hearing may be continued at the request of either party for good cause or by the court. If the hearing is continued, the order of protection must remain in effect until the court conducts the hearing.

(4) An action brought under this chapter may be filed in the county where the petitioner currently or temporarily resides, the county where the respondent resides, or the county where the abuse occurred. There is no minimum length of residency required to file a petition under this chapter.

(5) The right to petition for relief may not be denied because the petitioner has vacated the residence or household to avoid abuse.

(6) An order of protection issued under this section is effective throughout the state. Courts and law enforcement officials shall give full faith and credit to all orders of protection issued within the state.

(7) A certified copy of an order of protection from another state, along with proof of service, may be filed in a Montana court with jurisdiction over orders of protection in the county where the petitioner resides. If properly filed in Montana, an order of protection issued in another state must be enforced in the same manner as an order of protection issued in Montana. ""
 

MCA 40-15-102 (1) (a)

MCA 40-15-102 (1) (b)

MCA 40-15-102 (2) (b)

"" 40-15-102. Eligibility for order of protection.
(a) the petitioner is in reasonable apprehension of bodily injury by the petitioner's partner or family member as defined in 45-5-206; or

(b) the petitioner is a victim of one of the following offenses committed by a partner or family member:

(i) assault as defined in 45-5-201;

(ii) aggravated assault as defined in 45-5-202;

(iii) intimidation as defined in 45-5-203;

(iv) partner or family member assault as defined in 45-5-206;

(v) criminal endangerment as defined in 45-5-207;

(vi) negligent endangerment as defined in 45-5-208;

(vii) assault on a minor as defined in 45-5-212;

(viii) assault with a weapon as defined in 45-5-213;

(ix) unlawful restraint as defined in 45-5-301;

(x) kidnapping as defined in 45-5-302;

(xi) aggravated kidnapping as defined in 45-5-303; or

(xii) arson as defined in 45-6-103.

(2) The following individuals are eligible to file a petition for an order of protection against the offender regardless of the individual's relationship to the offender:

(a) a victim of assault as defined in 45-5-201, aggravated assault as defined in 45-5-202, assault on a minor as defined in 45-5-212, stalking as defined in 45-5-220, incest as defined in 45-5-507, sexual assault as defined in 45-5-502, or sexual intercourse without consent as defined in 45-5-503; or

(b) a partner or family member of a victim of deliberate homicide as defined in 45-5-102 or mitigated deliberate homicide as defined in 45-5-103.

(3) A parent, guardian ad litem, or other representative of the petitioner may file a petition for an order of protection on behalf of a minor petitioner against the petitioner's abuser. At its discretion, a court may appoint a guardian ad litem for a minor petitioner.

(4) A guardian must be appointed for a minor respondent when required by Rule 17(c), Montana Rules of Civil Procedure, or by 25-31-602. An order of protection is effective against a respondent regardless of the respondent's age.

(5) A petitioner is eligible for an order of protection whether or not:

(a) the petitioner reports the abuse to law enforcement;

(b) charges are filed; or

(c) the petitioner participates in a criminal prosecution.

(6) If a petitioner is otherwise entitled to an order of protection, the length of time between the abusive incident and the petitioner's application for an order of protection is irrelevant.  ""

(1) A person may file a petition for an order of protection if: MCA 40-15-101


MCA 40-15-101.
""Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to promote the safety and protection of all victims of partner and family member assault, victims of sexual assault, and victims of stalking. ""


I had Proof Sean was and Still is to this Day Stalking Me and Judge Hayne Denied me a Protective Order, Judge Clute used my Web Stats proving Sean was Stalking me to LIE and say I was stalking Him.

MCA 40-15-116

"" 40-15-116. Definitions. As used in 40-15-115 through 40-15-121, the following definitions apply:


(1) "Applicant" means a victim and includes a parent or guardian who acts on behalf of a victim.

(2) "Department" means the department of justice.

(3) "Participant" means an applicant who has submitted an application pursuant to 40-15-117 that has been approved by the department.

(4) "Partner or family member assault" has the meaning provided in 45-5-206.

(5) "Sexual assault" means sexual assault as defined in 45-5-502, sexual intercourse without consent as defined in 45-5-503, incest as defined in 45-5-507, or sexual abuse of children as defined in 45-5-625.

(6) "Stalking" has the meaning provided in 45-5-220.

(7) "Victim" means an individual who has been a victim of partner or family member assault, sexual assault, or stalking or who is otherwise eligible to file a petition for an order of protection under 40-15-102.  ""


45-5-220. Stalking -- exemption -- penalty. (1) A person commits the offense of stalking if the person purposely or knowingly causes another person substantial emotional distress or reasonable apprehension of bodily injury or death by repeatedly:

(a) following the stalked person; or

(b) harassing, threatening, or intimidating the stalked person, in person or by mail, electronic communication, as defined in 45-8-213, or any other action, device, or method.

(2) This section does not apply to a constitutionally protected activity.

(3) For the first offense, a person convicted of stalking shall be imprisoned in the county jail for a term not to exceed 1 year or fined an amount not to exceed $1,000, or both. For a second or subsequent offense or for a first offense against a victim who was under the protection of a restraining order directed at the offender, the offender shall be imprisoned in the state prison for a term not to exceed 5 years or fined an amount not to exceed $10,000, or both. A person convicted of stalking may be sentenced to pay all medical, counseling, and other costs incurred by or on behalf of the victim as a result of the offense.

(4) Upon presentation of credible evidence of violation of this section, an order may be granted, as set forth in Title 40, chapter 15, restraining a person from engaging in the activity described in subsection (1).

(5) For the purpose of determining the number of convictions under this section, "conviction" means:

(a) a conviction, as defined in 45-2-101, in this state;

(b) a conviction for a violation of a statute similar to this section in another state; or

(c) a forfeiture of bail or collateral deposited to secure the defendant's appearance in court in this state or another state for a violation of a statute similar to this section, which forfeiture has not been vacated.

(6) Attempts by the accused person to contact or follow the stalked person after the accused person has been given actual notice that the stalked person does not want to be contacted or followed constitutes prima facie evidence that the accused person purposely or knowingly followed, harassed, threatened, or intimidated the stalked person.  ""


Judge Hayne is a District Judge in Hamilton, he wrote down and signed all the reasons WHY he would NOT allow me a Protective Order against Sean Boushie - yet 2 weeks later I was Served a Protected Order Against me for Sean Boushie. So which judge is in the Right, which Judge Broke Montana State Laws. Why the Double Standards, why the Set up against me, Why was I denied all Due Process and Severely Discriminated Against.

Judge Hayne also Clarifies in this Document that You Do NOT legally qualify as a Victim in Montana unless a Criminal Offense has been committed. This means that the Person must have been convicted of committing the Offense.

So Why Does Judge Clute Hamilton JP not have to adhere to these laws but Judge Hayne puts these laws in place and Denies me Protection. I tried to Show Judge Robin Clute the above and she Yelled this is my Court and I don't Care what other Courts Say. So Montana Corruption?


Sean Boushie was Stalking me 7 months ago and continues to this Day, I was NEVER Stalking him only posting Factual Stats on my Website and Writing on My Blog in a Legal Manner.  He Stalks me on PAID time at the University of Montana all day every day... week day.. He has Hate Sites, and Welcomes Members... posts hate and defamation on Craigs list over and over, emails me, threatens me and Still NO PROTECTION for Me.
I was not guilty of or Convicted of Stalking yet that is what Judge Clute based her Protective Order on and Meanwhile Sean Stalks me, emails me, attacks me defames, runs hate sites and groups against me and This Really is Stalking and NO One Does Anything.  This really is Defamation and the LAW Does NOTHING.  My Blogs are NOT Breaking the Law.  Sean Boushie is Breaking the Law and He has a Protective order against me due to Corrupt Montana Courts.

Click on Judge Hayne Document to Enlarge

Posted by Crystal L. Cox
to defend My Life against
Montana Corruption.