Monday, December 7, 2015

Anti-Corruption Film Producer Bill Windsor of Lawless America continues to thoroughly expose corrupt judges, detectives, and county attorneys in Montana. As well as to expose the University of Montana as they aid and abet corruption in the State of Montana.

Is Judge James A. Haynes of Ravalli County Montana Corrupt, Stupid, or Both?  

On December 3, 2015, Bill Windsor filed a Motion to Dismiss one of his criminal charges due to expiration of the Statute of Limitations.

It is a very simple issue, a no-brainer, but what Judge James A. Haynes did on December 4, 2015 is a stupid execution of his corruption...

First, some basics:

Crime or Offense or Event:  a violation of any penal statute of the state of Montana.  The State of Montana has charged in writing that Bill Windsor committed the crime of violation of a protective order on August 24, 2013.

Charge: a written statement that accuses a person of the commission of an offense, that is presented to a court.  In Montana, a criminal complaint is made by the filing of an "Information."  When leave to file an information has been granted, a warrant or summons may issue for the defendant's arrest or appearance, so this marks the beginning of the Prosecution.  The State of Montana filed its Information on October 3, 2014.

Offender: an accused defendant in a criminal case.  In this matter, Bill Windsor is the alleged Offender -- the person who allegedly committed this crime.

Prosecution:  A proceeding instituted and carried on by due course of law, before a competent tribunal, for the purpose of determining the guilt or innocence of a person charged with crime.  The "Prosecution" begins when the charge is filed.  In this matter, that was October 3, 2014.

Proceeding:  a case heard and determined by a court.  In this matter, the case is DC-14-509 in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Missoula County Montana.  As the Docket shows, it began on October 3, 2014.

Lesser Included Offense:  defined in MCA 46-1-202(9) "Included offense" means an offense that: (a) is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; (b) consists of an attempt to commit the offense charged or to commit an offense otherwise included in the offense charged; or (c) differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less serious injury or risk to the same person, property, or public interest or a lesser kind of culpability suffices to establish its commission.   Wikipedia explains it more clearly: A lesser included offense, in criminal law, is a crime for which all of the elements necessary to impose liability are also elements found in a more serious crime.  For example, the common law crime of larceny requires the taking and carrying away of tangible property from another person, with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of that property. Robbery, under the common law, requires all of the same elements, plus the use of force or intimidation to accomplish the taking. Therefore, larceny is a lesser included offense in the offense of robbery, as every robbery includes a larceny as part of the crime. Assault is also a lesser included offense of robbery, just as battery is necessarily a lesser included offense to murder, and false imprisonment is usually a lesser included offense to kidnapping.  In this matter, there was only one charge: violation of a protective order by not giving Sean Boushie the website owned by Bill Windsor promoting his movie and TV expose of Sean Boushie's criminal activiites.  It was not a lesser-included offense of anything.  It was a stand-alone offense.

Statute of Limitations: Laws passed by a legislative body to set the maximum time after an Event when legal Proceedings may be initiated.  When the period of time specified in a statute of limitations passes, a Charge can no longer be filed.  The statutory specifications are referred to as "limitations."  Bill Windsor's alleged crime is a misdemeanor.  The Statute of Limitations is one year.  This means the Charge for the August 24, 2013 alleged crime had to be filed by August 23, 2014.

Tolling: A legal doctrine which allows for the pausing or delaying of the running of the period of time set forth by a statute of limitations.  This is not relevant in this case as is explained below.

Motion To Dismiss:  A motion filed asking a court to dismiss a case or Charge.

Here is the Motion to Dismiss due to Expiration of the Statute of Limitations:

William M. Windsor, Defendant, files this “Motion to Dismiss Charge #1 – Website due to Statute of Limitations,” pursuant to Montana Code Annotated (“MCA”) 45-1-205(2)(b), with incorporated Brief in Support.  Windsor contacted the prosecutor’s office for concurrence, and Ms. Jennifer Clark stated that she will oppose this motion and did not have the time to justify the opposition.

MCA 45-1-205(2)(b) requires that “A prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within 1 year after it is committed.” (Milanovich v. Milanovich, (1982), 201 Mont. 332, 334, 655 P.2d 963, 964.) (See also State v. Poncelet, 187 Mont. 528, 610 P.2d 698 (Mont. 04/24/1980); Dexter v. Shields, 92 P.3d 1208, 322 Mont. 6, 2004 MT 159 (Mont. 06/22/2004); State v. Hamilton, 830 P.2d 1264, 252 Mont. 496 (Mont. 01/14/1992).)

Statute of Limitations has just become a defense in this case as the November 13, 2015 Second Amended Information [Docket #157] charges Count #1 as a misdemeanor. The State indicates this alleged crime was committed on August 24, 2013, over one year prior to the October 2, 2014 charge. The original Information said the alleged crime took place on October 2, 2014.

The substantive criminal statute is MCA 45-5-626: “(1) A person commits the offense of violation of an order of protection if the person, with knowledge of the order, purposely or knowingly violates a provision of any order provided for … under Title 40, chapter 15.” The explicit language of this statute precludes any claim that the offense is a continuing one. If it was a violation as charged, that violation took place on August 24, 2013.

A particular offense should not be construed as continuing “unless the explicit language of the substantive criminal statute compels such a conclusion, or the nature of the crime involved is such that [the legislature] must assuredly have intended that it be treated as a continuing one.” (Toussie v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 112, 115, 90 S.Ct. 858, 860, 25 L.Ed.2d 156, 161, citing United States v. Scharton (1932), 285 U.S. 518, 52 S.Ct. 416, 76 L.Ed. 917.

In State v. Larson (1989), 240 Mont. 203, 783 P.2d 416, the criminal offenses at issue occurred in October 1985. No charges were filed, however, until February 1988. At trial, the court reduced a theft charge from felony to misdemeanor after receiving evidence of the value of the items taken. In our opinion upholding the conviction, we stated, “[a]s a general rule, a defendant may not be convicted of a lesser included offense when the statute of limitations has run on that offense but not on the larger offense charged.” Larson, 240 Mont. at 205, 783 P.2d at 417, citing the Criminal Law Commission Comments to § 45-1-205, MCA. (State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283 (Mont. 11/23/1999).)

The statute of limitations is a jurisdictional issue. Milanovich v. Milanovich, supra. The alleged crime was committed on August 24, 2013 and was not charged until October 2, 2014. This Court has no jurisdiction as the statute of limitations on this misdemeanor expired.

In addition, the Second Amended information does not comply with the law.  MCA 46-11-205 requires an affidavit stating facts that show the existence of probable cause to support the charge as amended. There is no affidavit.

WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above, William M. Windsor requests that this Court order that Charge #1 is dismissed and order that Windsor has no restrictions on his websites.

This 2nd day of December 2015,
 William M. Windsor

On December 3, 2015, Judge James A. Haynes scribbled an "order" in the upper right hand corner of the Motion.  It says: "Defendant Windsor consistently extracts snippets of the law convenient to his arguments, and overlooks the rest.  He has done so again, ignoring 45-1-206(3) MCA and State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283, 297 Mont. 1, 989 P.2d 856.  This 'motion' may be filed, and this Order Denying Windsor's Motion to Dismiss is Final and requires no further briefing."

So, let's take a look at what Judge James A. Haynes has done to illustrate how corrupt  judges operate:

First, he headed this Motion off at the pass.  The State of Montana was not required to file a response, as the rules provide.  So, Bill Windsor was denied due process.  The State should have either responded that he is correct or come up with some bogus argument against the Motion.  Judge James A. Haynes didn't even allow the Clerk of the Court to file the motion until after he decided whether he would allow it.  Judge James A. Haynes has not allowed many of Bill Windsor's motions as this is one of the ways corrupt judges taint the record in a case.

Second, he did not issue an actual order.  This is a simulated action that will not actually show up on the Court Docket.

Third, he has once again demeaned Bill Windsor improperly, demonstrating his extreme bias.  Bill Windsor has never extracted snippets.  He always reviews every case on an issue.  In his Motion, he cited eight cases, including the only case that Judge James A. Haynes cited.  Bill Windsor cited four relevant statutes while Judge James A. Haynes cited a statute on tolling that has no relevance whatsoever to this matter.  He further demeans Bill Windsor by putting the word "motion" in quotes so as to mock it.  The motion is perfect -- short, sweet, totally in compliance with the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure and the District Court Rules and the Local Rules, and a slam dunk winner.  Criminal defendants are entitled to a fair and impartial judge.  "Judge" James A. Haynes is totally biased, and Bill Windsor has been repeatedly denied a fair pre-trial, and he expects the same mistreatment at the trial.

Fourth, he committed obstruction of justice by lying in his Order, and he denied Bill Windsor's Constitutional rights to due process.  He cited a completely bogus statute as his authority -- MCA 45-1-206(3). Here's what this statute says: "45-1-206. Periods excluded from limitation. The period of limitation does not run during: (3) a prosecution pending against the offender for the same conduct, even if the indictment, complaint, or information which commences the prosecution is dismissed."  This statute clearly addresses periods of time that are excluded from the statute of limitations period.  The statute immediately preceding MCA 45-1-206 is MCA 45-1-205. General time limitations spells out the limitations periods for various crimes.  MCA 45-1-205(2)(b) says: "(b) A prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within 1 year after it is committed."

So, let's put this in terms that a Fifth Grader in a state other than Montana would understand.  A "Limitation" sets the maximum time after an Event when legal proceedings may be initiated.  The State of Montana says the Event in this matter took place on August 24, 2013.  So, the clock starts on August 24, 2013.  The Limitation on this charge, a misdemeanor, is one year.  So, legal Proceedings had to begin not later than August 23, 2014.  But they did not begin until October 3, 2014 -- 406 days -- 41 days past the one year time limitation.  Judge James A. Haynes said in his "order" that Bill Windsor ignored 45-1-206(3) MCA.  Damn right he did because it has no relevance at all.  The Prosecution began on October 3, 2014.  The Limitations period had already expired.  There was no limitations period to run after the Charge was filed.

Bill Windsor searched every appellate court decision EVER on MCA 45-1-206(3), and State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283 (Mont. 11/23/1999) is the only case.  But all it says is that (a) a prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within one year after the offense is committed; (b) MCA 45-1-205 provides that a prosecution is commenced when an information or complaint is filed; (c) the Event (crime) was committed on March 13, 1997, and the Information was filed on April 7, 1997, so only 25 days after the Event, well within the one-year statute of limitations for misdemeanors; (d) the running of the statute of limitations is tolled when a prosecution is pending against the offender for the same conduct.  An Amended Information was filed April 14, 1998, and Mora argued that the Event was March 13, 1997 and the Amended Information was April 14, 1998, so the one-year statute of limitations expired.

But that argument was bogus and this is irrelevant in this case because Bill Windsor's Event was August 24, 2013, and the Prosecution began on October 3, 2014 -- 41 days past the year limitation.

If Bill Windsor was making the bogus argument that Mora made, he would be claiming that the Amended Information filed on November 13, 2015 meant that there had been 812 days.  Mora tried to use the Amended Information to turn his 25 day Event to prosecution time into 392 days by claiming the commencement of the prosecution didn't begin until the date of the Amended Information.  The Amended Information in Bill Windsor's case is irrelevant to the Statute of Limitations.

Bill Windsor says that Judge James A. Haynes appears to be intelligent, just mean and dishonest.  But it is hard to explain how a "judge" can say that Bill Windsor did not qualify for a temporary order of protection as Sean Boushie had not been arrested or convicted.  That's what Judge James A. Haynes ordered on August 9, 2013 after Sean Boushie attempted to murder Bill.  The statute on temporary orders of protection is MCA 40-15-102, which clearly states: (5) A petitioner is eligible for an order of protection whether or not: (a) the petitioner reports the abuse to law enforcement; (b) charges are filed; or (c) the petitioner participates in a criminal prosecution.  A Montana district court "judge" may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but a Fifth Grader (from any state but Montana) reading the statute would see and understand this.

Now he comes up with this ridiculous order to block the dismissal of one of the bogus charges.  Once again, even a Montana judge should be able to read a statute and review a case and comprehend what it says.  Bill Windsor believes Judge James A. Haynes is intelligent, just not smart enough to come up with a better way to camouflage his corruption or maybe he simply realizes that his corrupt bretheren will cover for him so he doesn't have to think.  One thing is crystal clear: Judge James A. Haynes is a corrupt judge.

This is everything that is said on the limitations issue in State v. Moga:

Section 45-1-205(2)(b), MCA, provides that a prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within one year after the offense is committed. The Jefferson County DUI charge against Moga was based on events of March 13, 1997, but the amended information charging Moga with misdemeanor DUI was not filed until April 14, 1998. Moga argues that the misdemeanor DUI charge against him in Jefferson County should have been dismissed for untimeliness pursuant to § 45-1-205(2)(b), MCA.

In so arguing, Moga relies upon this Court's opinion in State v. Larson (1989), 240 Mont. 203, 783 P.2d 416. In that case, the criminal offenses at issue occurred in October 1985. No charges were filed, however, until February 1988. At trial, the court reduced a theft charge from felony to misdemeanor after receiving evidence of the value of the items taken. In our opinion upholding the conviction, we stated, "[a]s a general rule, a defendant may not be convicted of a lesser included offense when the statute of limitations has run on that offense but not on the larger offense charged." Larson, 240 Mont. at 205, 783 P.2d at 417, citing the Criminal Law Commission Comments to § 45-1-205, MCA. The Court's decision did not follow from that statement, however. Instead, we ruled that because the defendant had failed to bring this claim in the district court, he was barred from bringing it on appeal. Larson, 240 Mont. at 206, 783 P.2d at 417-18.

Moreover, there are important factual differences between this case and Larson. In the present case, the first Jefferson County information was filed on April 7, 1997. Subsection (8) of § 45-1-205, MCA, provides that a prosecution is commenced when an indictment is found or an information or complaint is filed. The running of the statute of limitations is tolled when a prosecution is pending against the offender for the same conduct. Section 45-1-206(3), MCA.

We conclude that the Jefferson County prosecution against Moga was commenced and began to toll the statute of limitations when the original information was filed on April 7, 1997, well within the statute of limitations for misdemeanors. The amendment of the Jefferson County information did not retroactively deprive the District Court of jurisdiction based on the statute of limitations for misdemeanor offenses. We hold that the Fifth Judicial District Court did not err in denying Moga's motion to dismiss because of time limitations.

Bill Windsor will be doing a special filming after the trial in Missoula.  He wants to try to get as many victims as possible to come to the trial.  Then a group session will be filmed followed by filming of individual stories.  So, if you are in Montana or have friends there, please ask them to participate.  January 5-6, 2016.

For a quick update on Bill Windsor's saga and upcoming trial, see this summary on LawlessAmerica.com.

If you want to reach Bill Windsor, his home address is 110 East Center Street #1213, Madison, SD 57042.  That mail gets forwarded to him once a week.  His email is bill@billwindsor.com. His phone is 770-578-1094, but it is not answered; messages are checked by dialing in to Verizon from a state far, far away, and Bill receives an email with the name, number, and one sentence summary of each message.

For the Lawless America videos, see www.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica.  Bill Windsor's Facebook page is www.facebook.com/billwindsor1  Bill Windsor's Twitter account is www.twitter.com/lawlessamerica.  "

Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1872:judge-james-a-haynes-of-ravalli-county-montana-is-corrupt-stupid-or-both&catid=159:corruption&Itemid=236

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Can you IMAGINE, you have to contact an attorney as a matter of law. A University of Montana attorney, and then you go to jail for alleged violations of a non-existence protective order?

The Missoula County Attorneys Office and Detective Chris Shermer of the Missoula Police either do NOT know Montana Law and the U.S constitution or they are PAID to cover up the INFAMOUS Corruption in the State of Montana.

"Montana law states very clearly (MCA 45-5-220) that stalking does not apply to Constitutionally-protected activity. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press are the most fundamental of the Constitutionally-protected activities."


Source and Lot's More
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236

So Why in the WORLD does the Missoula County Attorneys Office and Dipshit Detective Chris Shermer think that they can use an expired protective order or any protective order to go to another state on Montana Taxpayers dime, to retrieve and JAIL some guy talking on a blog?

Hmmm..

"William M. Windsor never sent a Tweet. 

The State has no evidence that he did. 

The State has no evidence or testimony to indicate that he knowingly and purposely sent a Tweet to violate a protective order. Jennifer Clark swore to Judge Karen Townsend that William M. Windsor knowingly and purposely sent a Tweet to violate a protective order, but it was a false sworn pleading by Jennifer Clark."

Source and Lot's More
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236

For more Check Out
http://missoulacountyattorney.blogspot.com/

A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity YET the State of Montana uses Protective Orders to HARSHLY and Unconstitutionally shut down SPEECH that Speaks Critical of Montana Law Enforcement and the University of Montana, otherwise known as Whistle blower Retaliation and Selective Prosecution.

So there was a Made Up Tweet aKa Falsified Evidence, and there was no protective order and even if there was a protective ORDER well it does not apply to a CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity. WOW. 

I would say that the Missoula County Attorney's Office, Missoula County, the Missoula Police, Ravalli County, the Hamilton Police and the University of Montana will be paying 100's of Millions of Dollars to Michael Spreadbury, Crystal Cox and Bill Windsor. As You see the Montana Police went after Micheal and Crystal with the Protective Orders in hand, to STOP them from Blogging. Yet hmmm it was clearly A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity, and they CLEARLY knew this.

These same Montana Agencies that have CLEARLY Falsified Evidence against Bill Windsor to suppress information, chill online speech and flat out STOP the flow of information; well they did the same thing to the blogs of Crystal Cox and Michael Spreadbury, of which Windsor was FACTUALLY reporting on.  Crystal Cox's blogs were flat out shut down by a Protective Order, the man that threatened to kill her got, (Sean Boushie in case you forgot). Ya my blogs were shut down and I was not allowed to speak or blog his name of the University of Montana for a year, or I WOULD GO TO JAIL.

These same group of Law Enforcement agencies and the University of Montana, used an Unconstitutional PROTECTIVE ORDER to Shut down my blogs.  Yet now we see the MT Supreme Court rule that NOT allowed.

And this same group shut down Michael Spreadbury's constitutionally protected blogs and websites.

So Pattern and History? You Bet there is and LOT's of Evidence to that FACT.

 I, for one, can hardle wait for that RICO Lawsuit against ALL OF Ya'll. Coming Soon.


So now about this Blogging as "A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity"?

Say What? Even in Montana? Ya don't say.

Well we already know that RIGHT? Yet here we have it CRIMINAL in Good Ol' Corrupt Missoula Montana, AGAIN? Not only should this case be CLEARLY dismissed but there should be an internal affairs investigation, a DOJ investigation, an FBI investigation and a Human Rights investigation into all of these agencies Immediately.  The EVIDENCE against them is mountainous and times 3, as they did this to all three of us and we all have lot's of proof. So ya, Criminal RICO and Civil RICO coming up, ASAP.

Not even a Civil Case, but CRIMINAL.

Doesn't Jennifer Clark of the Missoula County Attorney Office KNOW anything about the First Amendment? Has she researched the Boushie / Windsor history at all? Or any Montana Supreme Court cases, or say Ninth Circuit cases about BLOGGING?

Well look at this;

"The Montana Supreme Court previously ruled in Windsor v. Boushie that William M. Windsor’s blogging is not stalking and cannot be denied by any order of protection. Tweeting is a short form of blogging.

“…the offense of stalking does not apply to a constitutionally protected activity, § 45-5-220(2), MCA, and, as the District Court noted, the blogging alleged here involved First Amendment ‘free speech’ rights with which [Windsor and Boushie] each appear familiar and in which they regularly engage.” (Windsor v. Boushie, DA 13-0618 (Mont. 02/25/2014).)"


Source and Full Article
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236

A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity YET the State of Montana uses Protective Orders to HARSHLY and Unconstitutionally shut down SPEECH that Speaks Critical of Montana Law Enforcement and the University of Montana, otherwise known as Whistle blower Retaliation and Selective Prosecution.

So there was a Made Up Tweet aKa Falsified Evidence, and there was no protective order and even if there was a protective ORDER well it does not apply to a CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity. WOW. 

I would say that the Missoula County Attorney's Office, Missoula County, the Missoula Police, Ravalli County, the Hamilton Police and the University of Montana will be paying 100's of Millions of Dollars to Michael Spreadbury, Crystal Cox and Bill Windsor. As You see the Montana Police went after Micheal and Crystal with the Protective Orders in hand, to STOP them from Blogging. Yet hmmm it was clearly A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity, and they CLEARLY knew this.

These same Montana Agencies that have CLEARLY Falsified Evidence against Bill Windsor to suppress information, chill online speech and flat out STOP the flow of information; well they did the same thing to the blogs of Crystal Cox and Michael Spreadbury, of which Windsor was FACTUALLY reporting on.  Crystal Cox's blogs were flat out shut down by a Protective Order, the man that threatened to kill her got, (Sean Boushie in case you forgot). Ya my blogs were shut down and I was not allowed to speak or blog his name of the University of Montana for a year, or I WOULD GO TO JAIL.

These same group of Law Enforcement agencies and the University of Montana, used an Unconstitutional PROTECTIVE ORDER to Shut down my blogs.  Yet now we see the MT Supreme Court rule that NOT allowed.

And this same group shut down Michael Spreadbury's constitutionally protected blogs and websites.

So Pattern and History? You Bet there is and LOT's of Evidence to that FACT.

 I, for one, can hardle wait for that RICO Lawsuit against ALL OF Ya'll. Coming Soon.


So now about this Blogging as "A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity"?

Say What? Even in Montana? Ya don't say.

Well we already know that RIGHT? Yet here we have it CRIMINAL in Good Ol' Corrupt Missoula Montana, AGAIN? Not only should this case be CLEARLY dismissed but there should be an internal affairs investigation, a DOJ investigation, an FBI investigation and a Human Rights investigation into all of these agencies Immediately.  The EVIDENCE against them is mountainous and times 3, as they did this to all three of us and we all have lot's of proof. So ya, Criminal RICO and Civil RICO coming up, ASAP.

Not even a Civil Case, but CRIMINAL.

Doesn't Jennifer Clark of the Missoula County Attorney Office KNOW anything about the First Amendment? Has she researched the Boushie / Windsor history at all? Or any Montana Supreme Court cases, or say Ninth Circuit cases about BLOGGING?

Well look at this;

"The Montana Supreme Court previously ruled in Windsor v. Boushie that William M. Windsor’s blogging is not stalking and cannot be denied by any order of protection. Tweeting is a short form of blogging.

“…the offense of stalking does not apply to a constitutionally protected activity, § 45-5-220(2), MCA, and, as the District Court noted, the blogging alleged here involved First Amendment ‘free speech’ rights with which [Windsor and Boushie] each appear familiar and in which they regularly engage.” (Windsor v. Boushie, DA 13-0618 (Mont. 02/25/2014).)"


Source and Full Article
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236

Sunday, July 5, 2015

False Arrests, Civil Rights Violations, Property Damage, Searches and stealing property with no search warrant, and much more. ALL these agencies will face massive Legal Action against them.

2015-06-30-idaho-meridian-fedex-cropped-200w 
Bill Windsor returned to the scene of the crime in Meridian Idaho.
This is the FedEx Store in Meridian Idaho where crimes against Bill Windsor began on February 19, 2015... 
Bill Windsor used to be a great customer of FedEx.  Janna Fettinger of FedEx ended that business relationship on February 19, 2015.  Bill Windsor walked in to overnight some court filings to Ellis County Texas.  Crack clerk Janna Fettinger spotted William Michael Windsor aka William M. Windsor aka Bill Windsor from a Wanted Poster that had been faxed to FedEx stores all across America by corrupt Ellis County Texas District Attorney Patrick Wilson.  Bill Windsor has never committed a crime in his life, but little details like that don't get in the way of District Attorney Patrick Wilson.
 windsor-wanted-poster-640w
From reading the Meridian Police Department Report, it seems that when Janna Fettinger received the Wanted Poster fax from Ellis County Texas, she recognized Bill Windsor aka Montana aka BamPa, aka Mr. Bill aka The World's Most Notorious Tweeter aka Lawless America as a previous customer.  She called the PoPo, and they told her to call back if she saw him again.
2015-06-30-idaho-meridian-fedex-640w
So, in walks unsuspecting Bill Windsor just after noon on February 19, 2015 (Dumb Move #1).  Eagle Eye Fettinger spotted him.  But as the professional that she is, she waited until FedEx processed Bill's credit card before she called in the Mounted Police.  Bill asked Eagle Eye for directions to the AT&T Store, so she knew right where he was going. (Dumb move #2 by Bill). 
Janna Fettinger called the Meridian Police Department, and Officer Geoff Rowe and about a half dozen Meridian Police Officers responded. 
2015-07-02-idaho-meridian-att-parking-space-storefront-640w
Bill Windsor had driven to the shopping center where the AT&T Store was, and he parked his vehicle three stores away and across the driveway from AT&T in the space on the far right of this photo.
2015-06-30-idaho-meridian-att-store-640w
Bill Windsor walked 112-feet into the AT&T Store on Eagle Road in Meridian Idaho.
2015-06-30-idaho-meridian-att-store-window-cropped-640w
Bill was standing where the boy in the baseball cap is at the counter at the back of the AT&T Store.  All of a sudden, the eyes of the two male clerks grew as big as saucers, and their mouths flew open.  Bill Windsor saw them staring past him.  
matt-sweat-mugshots-320w
The police came into AT&T with guns drawn!  You would have thought it was Richard Matt and David Sweat.  Then Bill Windsor heard his name, and he was asked to put his hands behind him with his thumbs up, so he did.  He was frisked and cuffed.  Everything that he had on him was taken.
meridian-police-suv-640w
William M. Windsor was loaded into the back of a police car and taken to the Ada County Jail. 
Bill Windsor has now read the Police Report, and it was fairly accurate.  He was never arrested and never read his rights, and the Police Report didn't claim that he was.  He was not asked to turn around, so the Police Report is false in that regard.  The Police Report also claims the police knew what they were grabbing William M. Windsor for, but they did not.  They didn't have any idea until 10 minutes or so after Bill was at the Ada County Jail in Boise Idaho.
ada-county-jail-aerial-640w
When Bill was processed at the Ada County Jail, his cash, credit cards, checks, cellphone, hard drives, and assorted possessions were inventoried.   Then Officer Geoff Rowe came over to the jailers and said he was taking everything as evidence because Ellis County Texas District Attorney Patrick Wilson and Ellis County Texas District Attorney Investigator Jeff Ward told him to.
wilson-patrick-voteforwilson-com-2-cropped-200w  jeff-ward-firing-range-200w
Patrick Wilson   Jeff Ward    
Bill Windsor was not anywhere near his vehicle when he was snatched, and the police had not followed him to the store.  But Investigator Jeff Ward told the Meridian Police Department to seize any vehicle that the key that was on him opened.  So, the Meridian Police Department went back to the shopping center and found a vehicle that opened.  The vehicle was loaded with all of Bill's legal files, his laptop, hard drive, evidence, and much more.
The Meridian Police Department illegally seized the vehicle, searched it, loaded all of the contents into plastic bags, stuck stickers all over the exterior, impounded it, and then lied to Bill Windsor's representatives who called when the vehicle was found to be missing.  The Meridian Police lied and said they didn't have the vehicle.  Crack detective work on the part of Bill's agents discovered after calling all the towing companies in town that one of them had indeed towed the vehicle to the Meridian Police Department.
jeff-ward-firing-range-640w
After several jugs of Goo Gone, the impound sticker gum is still all over the vehicle.  Jeff Ward should have to pay for a new paint job as well as lots and lots of monetary damages for orchestrating the illegal seizure and search of Bill Windsor's vehicle and property.
dc-14-509-idaho-mugshot-2015-02-19-cropped-320w 
Bill Windsor was unlawfully incarcerated in the Ada County Jail, unlawfully denied bond, and had a host of Constitutional rights violated.  And to add insult to injury, the Idaho mugshot was not nearly as good as the Texas mugshot. 
And these photos are the scenes of the crime.

Source of Post in Full

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Jennifer Clark, Tyler Dugger, and Kirsten Pabst have committed prosecutorial misconduct and have filed false pleadings with the Missoula Montana Court

"Bill Windsor has been charged with violating a Montana protective order from his home in Dallas, Texas.
To charge someone with such a crime, prosecutors Jennifer ClarkTyler Dugger, and Kirsten Pabst had to swear that William M. Windsor intentionally committed these five crimes...
...but they have NO SUCH EVIDENCE.
Jennifer ClarkTyler Dugger, and Kirsten Pabst have committed prosecutorial misconduct and have filed false pleadings with the Missoula Montana Courts.
As there is no evidence, there is no probable cause for the five criminal charges against Bill Windsor, and Jennifer ClarkTyler Dugger, and Kirsten Pabst have filed false sworn pleadings with the courts.
Jennifer ClarkTyler Dugger, and Kirsten Pabst, where's the evidence?  Bill Windsor says you have produced no such evidence, and you told Judge James A. Haynes that ALL evidence had been provided.
As Bill Windsor has sworn under oath that he never intentionally committed any crime, the only honorable thing for you to do is to dismiss all charges.  He has repeatedly offered to be polygraphed.
If you don't dismiss all charges, it simply provides further proof that you are dishonest, corrupt, and have a void of moral and ethical values.
To convict Bill Windsor of violating a protective order, the jury must decide that, BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, Bill Windsor intended to commit a crime when he allegedly sent a Tweet, emailed an attorney for the University of Montana, published the words "Sean Boushie" online four times in two legal documents, and filmed a movie and pilot for a TV show exposing Sean Boushie and the University of Montana as criminals.
The State's five witnesses are Sean Boushie, Detective Chris Shermer, attorneyClaudia Denker-Eccles, attorney Lucy France, and IT guy Adrian Irish.  Bill Windsor has never spoken with any of these people, and his only communication with Sean Boushie, Claudia Denker-Eccles, and Lucy France has been legal filings.  So, the State has NO ONE who can testify as to what Bill Windsor's mental state was over nine months in Dallas, Texas.  And William M. Windsor has already sworn that he never intentionally violated any alleged protective order.
The State doesn't even have admissible evidence to prove that Bill Windsor did any of the five heinous crimes that he is accused of -- Tweet, email, and publishing -- much less evidence that he intentionally violated a protective order...from Texas, where there was no protective order.
Someone has told Jennifer ClarkTyler Dugger, and Kirsten Pabst to pursue these charges against William M. Windsor.  All except Tyler Dugger are smart enough to know that Bill Windsor has not committed any crime and that there is no evidence that he did. 
A person with inside information has reported that Bill Windsor generated the proof that the University of Montana is involved in criminal activity to attempt to silence whistleblowers.  Because of the evidence that Bill Windsor has, they set out to try to stop him.
University of Montana President, Royce Engstrom, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security are involved.  What other government entities are involved?
The only things that are beyond a reasonable doubt are that (1) Bill Windsor is a victim of corruption by Jennifer ClarkTyler Dugger, and Kirsten Pabst, and the University of Montana, and (2) Sean Boushie and his employer, the University of Montana, are criminals.
Oh, and one other thing is beyond a reasonable doubt: There is no doubt that Bill Windsor, a senior citizen with absolutely no criminal record whatsoever, has spent 134 days locked up in jail and denied bond because of what Jennifer ClarkTyler Dugger, and Kirsten Pabst have done to him...along with their co-conspirator, Ellis County Texas District Attorney Patrick Wilson."
Source of Post

Monday, June 1, 2015

Montana County Attorneys and Montana Law Enforcement REFUSE to INVESTIGATE and thereby refuse to KNOW THE TRUTH. This is Fraud on the Courts, fraud against victims, and a violation of Civil and Constitutional Rights.

Bill Windsor Said,  " It seems to me that they don't want to know the truth because that complicates their corrupt mission.  I hate to be so cynical, but nothing that has ever been done to me in Montana makes sense.  It has been dishonesty and corruption from the word GO."

Yes Bill Windsor, EXACTLY. 

It was the same thing with me and many I reported on. The Montana Detectives did not want to know. It was a 2 minute job to subpoena Google, Yahoo, and many others involved. I already had the information ready to go and the POLICE, the INVESTIGATORS refused to investigate, essentially refusing to know the TRUTH. Many of them said over and over, well, there is no way really to know. Yet it was EASY to prove yahoo, google, craigslist and many other sites, where the IP came from, who had posted the hate, where the death threats came from and they REFUSED.

The University of Montana is LIABLE for what has happened to Bill Windsor and to Crystal Cox, as well as countless other victims of Montana corruption and total lack of investigation.

Here is a chronology of what Sean Boushie, the University of Montana and Montana Authorities did to me, Crystal Cox. And they refuse to investigate any of it and therefore created a large of amount of victims who lost their business, could not sell property, faced extreme hate and they made me, my life, my business the collateral damage of their corruption adn refusal to investigate.

Below is Bill Windsor's chronology of what Sean Boushie did to him, and YET none of it was investigated and to the point of claiming he was the abuser, jailing him, putting his health in harm, and putting him under massive duress, in total violation of his Human Rights, Civil Rights and Constitutional Rights.

Here is a list of where Bill Windsor reached out to Montana authorities over and over again to get help, and they did nothing

Here is more of Bill's documentation on all this


So now we are at NOW, and Still NOTHING is being Done by the Missoula Police. It is EASY for the DOJ to see why rapes are NOT investigated in Montana. The Police and the University of Montana superpowers protect the rapists, their families, sports teams and the proverbial "bad guy".

"Bill Windsor volunteered to let Missoula Police Department conduct a forensic examination of his laptop to prove the truth in Montana

Bill Windsor volunteered to let Missoula Police Department conduct a forensic examination of his laptop to prove the truth in Montana.

The excuse the police use in regard to the massive cyberstalking of Sean Boushie is that Bill Windsor could have written those emails to himself.  So, check the computer; all of the emails are there.

Gee, why wouldn't they take William M. Windsor's generous offer ...

It makes you wonder.  It seems to me that they don't want to know the truth because that complicates their corrupt mission.

I hate to be so cynical, but nothing that has ever been done to me in Montana makes sense.  It has been dishonesty and corruption from the word GO.

If I was the prosecuting attorney and my interest is justice, I'd jump all over an offer of a free no-holds-barred inspection of a hard drive.

Bill Windsor's criminal complaint against Sean Boushie is now in the hands of the Missoula Police Department and the Missoula County Attorney's Office.  

So, the clock is ticking on whether they investigate.  If they investigate, they'll have firmly established that Sean Boushie is a criminal.  If they don't investigate, they will firmly establish that corruption is behind what is being done to me.

More information and comments are available on Bill Windsor's Facebook Page.

Bill Windsor has scheduled TalkShoe Show for Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 7:00 PM Central Time.  Please plan to join us.

Lawless America.  That's where we live.

Bill Windsor set out to film a movie exposing government, judicial, and law enforcement corruption.  He traveled to every state (except Alaska), and he filmed over 750 stories of corruption and has thousands more who wanted to be filmed.  Evil people, some working for various government entities and committing crimes, set out to destroy Bill Windsor and the movie, Lawless America.  Bill Windsor has been defamed online in the largest case of defamation in U.S. history.  His life has been threatened many times.

A UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE, Sean Boushie, attempted to murder Bill Windsor.   Sean Boushie then falsely claimed that Bill stalked him, threatened him with a gun, and a host of other lies.  Corrupt courts gave Sean Boushie a Temporary Order of Protection.  It expired on September 16, 2013, but corrupt Montana and Texas folks pretended it still existed, and a bench warrant was issued for unsuspecting Bill.

Bill Windsor was put into the Ellis County Texas Jail illegally for 53 days as a political prisoner -- held for extradition.  William M. Windsor was then unlawfully held in the Ada County Idaho Jail for 35 days and then illegally handed over to two Missoula County Montana Sheriff's Deputies on March 25, 2015.  He was held there for 46 days (a grand total of 134 days behind bars). He escaped (on bond) at 11:30 am on May 9, 2015.

The State of Montana has filed five criminal charges against William M. Windsor for sending a Tweet, publishing the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE's name (the would-be killer Sean Boushie) four times, sending a legal notice email to a University of Montana attorney, and filming the movie and the pilot for a TV show that will expose Montana as the most corrupt state in the country.  “Law enforcement” had LawlessAmerica.com removed from the Internet.  This website contains over 1,400 articles exposing corruption.  Bill Windsor worked with a friendly offshore hosting company to return the website to the Internet outside the clutches of American evildoers.  He wasn't so lucky when Facebook removed the movie page falsely claiming it promoted nudity, pornography, and solicitation of sex ... or when AT&T canceled the email that he used on everything related to the movie for years falsely claiming he violated their Terms of Service."

Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1636:bill-windsor-volunteered-to-let-missoula-police-department-conduct-a-forensic-examination-of-his-laptop-to-prove-the-truth-in-montana&catid=1:latest-news



"Bill Windsor volunteered for a Polygraph to prove the truth in Montana

Bill Windsor volunteered for a polygraph examination to prove the truth in Montana.

In fact, he volunteered for more than that.  Bill Windsor told the Missoula Police Department and the Missoula County Prosecuting Attorney to hook him to a polygraph to see that he has never said anything but the truth.

Gee, why wouldn't they take William M. Windsor's generous offer ...

It makes you wonder.  It seems to me that they don't want to know the truth because that complicates their corrupt mission.

I hate to be so cynical, but nothing that has ever been done to me in Montana makes sense.  It has been dishonesty and corruption from the word GO.

If I was the prosecuting attorney and my interest is justice, I'd jump all over an offer of a polygraph test.

Bill Windsor's criminal complaint against Sean Boushie is now in the hands of the Missoula Police Department and the Missoula County Attorney's Office.  So, the clock is ticking on whether they investigate.  If they investigate, they'll have firmly established that Sean Boushie is a criminal.  If they don't investigate, they will firmly establish that corruption is behind what is being done to me.

More information and comments are available on Bill Windsor's Facebook Page."

Source

ATTENTION:

I need a Civil Rights Attorney
NOT afraid of Corrupt Montana Courts.

I have over a years Proof of Corruption, Defamation, Hate Crimes against 4 MT Counties, the State of Montana, Several Law Enforcement Units, the Town of Eureka, City of Missoula and ALL named on this Blog are Liable.

Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
and Represent me in
a Multi-Million Dollar Lawsuit.


People Make a Living on the Internet. Haters Network to Do Real Harm on the Internet and to Get together to do Physical Harm. Montana Law Enforcement Does NOT understand the Power of the Internet.

If Montana Judges and Law Enforcement TRULY do NOT understand the Internet, Can't Read Web Stats, Track an IP or Get How to Track Down Cyber Crimes then Montana Needs to HIRE people in Every County that Can do that... Peoples Lives, Real Estate, Business, Reputation and Quality of Life is At Stake...

What is Montana Law Enforcment Waiting FOR ???